Do you think that in the coming years, as happened with MWI, there will be more and more people are convinced that the distinction between multiverse Level I and Level III does not occur to be?
Max Tegmark: I think this will probably be the case. However, although there are indications of a possible unification as I explain in my book, we still have many issues to resolve before we really know if this is really one and the same multiverse. The controversy of the firewall with the physics of black holes , for example, is an illustration of the fact that we do not yet have a good understanding of the gravitational quantum. It is necessary for us to hope to really decide.
http://androidstars.newsvine.com/_news/2014/08/05/25184701-nasa-unveils-curiosity-2-which-will-roll-out-in-march-2021
http://androidgeek.ucoz.com/blog/the_choice_of_instruments_reflects_the_advanced_curiosity/2014-08-06-12
http://carmiell.blogspot.com/2014/08/whale-watching-is-endangering-humpback.html
Futura-Sciences: The theory of general relativity and the prediction of the existence of antimatter are deeply rooted in pure mathematics, namely the Riemann geometry of curved spaces and n-dimensional spinors that Paul Dirac was led introducing to build his quantum theory of electrons in the space-time . Not regularities in the physical world that the brains of living creatures were able to experiment and to learn to master to survive during evolution. These findings seem to show that we can not have invented these mathematical structures, or have inherited from our predecessors in the history of the biosphere . Indeed, our ordinary intuition after our confrontation with the objects of everyday life fails in the quantum and relativistic world, but not our mathematical theories, on the contrary.
So it seems difficult to escape the conclusion that theoretical physics in the twentieth th century proved that Pythagoras and Plato were right. Or at least that their theories about the nature of human knowledge have falsifiable predictions that, for the moment, were corroborated in the sense of Popper, unlike other explanations offered.
Max Tegmark: I think this will probably be the case. However, although there are indications of a possible unification as I explain in my book, we still have many issues to resolve before we really know if this is really one and the same multiverse. The controversy of the firewall with the physics of black holes , for example, is an illustration of the fact that we do not yet have a good understanding of the gravitational quantum. It is necessary for us to hope to really decide.
http://androidstars.newsvine.com/_news/2014/08/05/25184701-nasa-unveils-curiosity-2-which-will-roll-out-in-march-2021
http://androidgeek.ucoz.com/blog/the_choice_of_instruments_reflects_the_advanced_curiosity/2014-08-06-12
http://carmiell.blogspot.com/2014/08/whale-watching-is-endangering-humpback.html
Futura-Sciences: The theory of general relativity and the prediction of the existence of antimatter are deeply rooted in pure mathematics, namely the Riemann geometry of curved spaces and n-dimensional spinors that Paul Dirac was led introducing to build his quantum theory of electrons in the space-time . Not regularities in the physical world that the brains of living creatures were able to experiment and to learn to master to survive during evolution. These findings seem to show that we can not have invented these mathematical structures, or have inherited from our predecessors in the history of the biosphere . Indeed, our ordinary intuition after our confrontation with the objects of everyday life fails in the quantum and relativistic world, but not our mathematical theories, on the contrary.
So it seems difficult to escape the conclusion that theoretical physics in the twentieth th century proved that Pythagoras and Plato were right. Or at least that their theories about the nature of human knowledge have falsifiable predictions that, for the moment, were corroborated in the sense of Popper, unlike other explanations offered.
No comments:
Post a Comment